Your Name
2dabf8ef03
- memory/: cross-session project memory with decisions, lessons, failures, architecture, and sessions categories. Each has format templates and lifecycle documentation. - skills/: 12 reusable specialized methodologies (tdd, systematic-debugging, architecture-design, code-review, security-review, repository-analysis, failure-analysis, refactoring, test-analysis, incident-investigation, browser-automation, research). Each has frontmatter and methodology sections. - improvements/: proposal-based improvement system requiring human approval. - scripts/memory-lifecycle.sh: deterministic memory operations (recall, store, list, search, sessions, cleanup). - scripts/test-memory-system.sh: 12 structural tests for all new systems. - orchestrator.md: added Memory Recall stage, Learning and Memory Storage stage, Improvement Proposals workflow, memory/skills rules, and 3 new actions (A23-A27) to the action catalog. Updated behavioral acceptance test and state separation model. - All 12 subagents: added Memory & Skills Awareness sections with recall and store instructions. - docs/AGENT_ARCHITECTURE.md: documented memory, skills, and improvements systems (sections 12-14). Updated action count (27), state model, and remaining weaknesses. - README.md: documented new systems, updated repository layout, added test-memory-system.sh documentation. All 39 tests pass (16 architecture + 12 memory + 11 bootstrap).
60 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
60 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: test-analysis
|
|
description: Test analysis — evaluating test quality, coverage gaps, and test strategy
|
|
version: "1.0"
|
|
owner: Tester
|
|
prerequisites: test suite exists
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Test Analysis
|
|
|
|
## When to use this skill
|
|
|
|
- Evaluating test quality before accepting changes
|
|
- Identifying coverage gaps
|
|
- Designing test strategy for new features
|
|
|
|
## Core methodology
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
EXAMINE TESTS → ASSESS COVERAGE → EVALUATE QUALITY → IDENTIFY GAPS → PRIORITIZE → RECOMMEND
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Analysis dimensions
|
|
|
|
### Coverage
|
|
- What code paths are exercised?
|
|
- What branches are tested?
|
|
- What error conditions are covered?
|
|
|
|
### Quality
|
|
- Do tests verify behavior (not implementation)?
|
|
- Are tests independent (no ordering dependencies)?
|
|
- Are tests deterministic (no flakiness)?
|
|
- Are assertions meaningful (not just "no crash")?
|
|
|
|
### Completeness
|
|
- Are edge cases tested?
|
|
- Are boundary conditions covered?
|
|
- Are error paths tested?
|
|
- Are integration points verified?
|
|
|
|
### Maintainability
|
|
- Are tests readable?
|
|
- Are tests well-organized?
|
|
- Are tests fast enough for the feedback loop?
|
|
|
|
## Common pitfalls
|
|
|
|
- Testing implementation details (breaks on refactor)
|
|
- Writing tests that always pass (no real verification)
|
|
- Missing the failure path (happy path only)
|
|
- Slow tests that discourage running them
|
|
- Flaky tests that erode confidence
|
|
|
|
## Exit criteria
|
|
|
|
- Coverage gaps identified with severity
|
|
- Test quality assessment complete
|
|
- Recommendations for improvement prioritized
|