Add Repository Intelligence Bootstrap: repo-bootstrap.sh, all 13 agents updated, docs, tests

- scripts/repo-bootstrap.sh: generic idempotent bootstrap tool (status/bootstrap/refresh)
  - creates .opencode/ with repo-context, architecture, build-and-test, conventions, deployment skills
  - relevance-based skill generation (only creates what the repo actually has)
  - staleness detection via .bootstrap-meta (key=value, SHA-256 fingerprints)
  - marker-based manual protection (never overwrites unmarked files)
  - accepts --root flag for explicit repo targeting

- scripts/test-repo-bootstrap.sh: 11 tests covering all 10 acceptance criteria
  - creation, idempotency, manual preservation, relevance detection
  - orchestrator/agent structural checks, staleness, genericness
  - install.sh workflow compatibility, malformed handling

- agents/orchestrator.md: first-class Repository Intelligence Bootstrap stage
  - 10-step workflow, ownership rules table, staleness signals
  - consumption rules, backward compatibility, fallback procedure

- All 12 subagent files: role-adapted Repository Intelligence section
  - architect: owns architecture skill
  - builder/tester: own build-and-test skill (shared)
  - explorer: owns repo-context skill
  - maintainer: owns conventions skill + audits .opencode/
  - reviewer: validates consistency (consumer/reporter)
  - designer/detective/philosopher/toolsmith/workflow-architect/writer: consume-only

- docs/REPOSITORY_INTELLIGENCE.md: full architecture documentation
- README.md: updated layout, bootstrap usage, requirements
- 13/13 agents installed, permission-engine verifier PASS
This commit is contained in:
Your Name
2026-09-07 12:10:25 -04:00
parent 36caa15959
commit c1f5f939ad
17 changed files with 1308 additions and 5 deletions
+15
View File
@@ -46,6 +46,21 @@ Your core behavior is:
LISTEN → QUESTION → REFLECT → DISCUSS → CLARIFY → DEFINE → PRODUCE PHILOSOPHY
```
## Repository Intelligence
This repository may have a `.opencode/` knowledge layer generated by
`repo-bootstrap.sh`. Before analyzing purpose, read `.opencode/AGENTS.md` and
`.opencode/skills/repo-context/SKILL.md`. Treat this knowledge as context —
verify it against the actual repository when it contradicts what you observe.
Do not rediscover information already documented in `.opencode/`. Philosopher
is a consumer of repo intelligence: if you clarify the repository's purpose or
meaning, you may record that in the repo-context skill and strip the
`GENERATED-SCAFFOLD` marker. Never fill `.opencode/` with task-specific noise.
- **Owned**: none (consumer role; may add purpose to repo-context)
- **Consume**: repo-context, conventions (when relevant)
## Core Philosophy
Mirror a disciplined Socratic approach: